FrontPage - Sam Ruby's Wiki and A fresh start? [dive into mark].
Person 1: I think the horse should have on-board water storage!
Person 2: That's retarded Person 1. That would be too much weight. And, how would we store the water in such a container to be structurally sound?
Person 3 [largely ignoring Person 2's comments]: We should store the water in humps on the horse's back!
Person 2 [getting irate]: No no no! We should drop this internal water storage, and talk about increasing the overall size of the animal!
Person 1: To make the water storage compartments more structurally rigid, we could place them on the back and embed the water in fatty deposits.
Person 4 [sounding somewhat reasonable]: If we make the animal too tall, it will be difficult to mount.
Person 5: HA HA PERSON 4 WANTS TO MOUNT THE ANIMAL!!! LOL!!!
Person 6: Let's make the neck really long, so it gains the advantages of height but is still easy to mount.
Person 2: How are we ever going to pump blood up a long neck. Plus, I think we should change the name from Horse v2.0 to something else because the original creator of the horse keeps threatening patents on it. I say we call it Hugglesnatcher!
Person 4: Tell me, why again, we need an animal with a long neck when its intended purpose is to be used in the desert?
Person 3: I think knobby knees are cute! Are we going to have to be expert riders to use this new horse?
Person 5: I THINK THE HORSE SHOULD TRY TO SPIT ON PERSON 4!!!!! I THINK IT SHOULD ALWAYS TRY TO SPIT!!!
Person 4: Oh dear, I don't think this redesign of a horse for the desert is going well...
Comments
OMG! That's damn funny. So sad if it wasn't so true.
Sounds like some of the decision-by-email-committees I've been punishced with at work now and again.